About Me

My photo
Born in Milan, Italy, he moved to the U.S. in order to study animation at Ringling College of Art and Design. After a brief experience in Pixar and Dreamworks he graduated and started working at Blue Sky Animation Studios where he currently helps making movies. He is often found doodling or otherwise painting.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Imaginears Animation Studio SCAM – Former Pixar employee, Ken Sullivan to lead Steampunk AL reboot.

On June 23rd 2014 I received an e-mail from a CG artist claiming that Kenneth Sullivan, a former Pixar employee and current associate to the Murphy brothers, contacted him in May of 2014 and hired him to model a CG character.

In his first e-mail to the CG artist, Ken Sullivan introduced himself as the Project manager for an undisclosed short film and mentioned two individuals, a director and a producer, but didn’t reveal their identities. These two individuals were most likely Adam and Antony Murphy, since upon completion of his services, the CG artist was paid through a paypal account associated with Imaginears Animation Studio.

This is the Scottish Animation Studio that stole some of my artwork and tried to raise $250,000 through kickstarter, without my knowledge, permission and without compensating me, in direct violation of US copyright laws. These are the same people who repeatedly threatened to sue me for $10,000,000 in an attempt to bully me and silence me.

In a following e-mail to the CG artist Ken included an e-mail from the short film Directors, where they praised the CG artist work and once again confirmed Ken Sullivan as their project manager. The signature to their e-mail indicated the short film’s code-name to be “Project Rita“.
The reason why the Directors didn’t e-mail the CG artist themselves, nor reveal their identities was most likely in order to prevent the CG artist from googling their names and realizing they were notorious scam artists. Similarly, the reason why Ken and the twins referred to the project as “Project Rita” as opposed to “Steampunk AL” was to avoid being associated with their previous kickstarter fiasco.


The CG artist was provided with a character package that included turnarounds for the character and he was asked to create a CG model of the character.


Upon completion of his services, the artist was paid through a paypal account associated with Imaginears Animation Studio. Out of curiosity, the artist googled the company name, found numerous references to their scam and immediately alerted me. His final model is shown below.
The character design that he was provided with, matches a design that appeared online on the Murphy‘s now-defunct crowd-funding blog, in late 2013. A comparison between my design, their derived design and the CG model is shown below.


This is the Murphy‘s second attempt at deriving a CG model from my original artwork. Below is a comparison between my original design from 2012 and a design, that was produced in 2013 by a paid contractor who the twins provided with my artwork and asked to reproduce it.


Upon receiving this information, I contacted Ken through Facebook and asked him if he had been in touch with the twins. He lied to me and told me he hadn’t heard from them in a few months. I asked him about “Project Rita” and he suddenly stopped replying. Almost immediately the CG artist told me he got an e-mail from Ken asking him what he had told me.
I asked Ken if there was anything I could do to help him and I asked him to explain to me why he was still working for the twins at the risk of ruining his reputation.
He never replied to my questions and shortly afterwards he blocked me on Facebook.


I contacted him through his phone number and he admitted working for the twins, although he referred to his position as a “liaison between the parties”. This his despite his own e-mails where he repeatedly referred to himself to and was referred to by the twins as “Project Manager” for “Project Rita“.

ken_text_01 ken_text_02 ken_text_03 ken_text_04

Ken Sullivan is currently the only person I am aware of, who is still collaborating with the twins despite being fully aware of their repeated acts of copyright infringement, defamation and legal attempts to bully me into silence. He chose to continue to work for them in spite of the possibility that it could affect his professional reputation. 

Pixar, a former employer of Mr. Sullivan--whose employment was terminated in 2012--, never participated to the scam and is in no way associated with Mr. Sullivan's or the Murphy's wrongdoings.

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Adam and Antony Murphy's Imaginears Animation Studio demands $10,000,000 in damages.

On 04/25/14  I received a letter from a solicitor hired by Adam and Antony Murphy, claiming that the twins reputation suffered irreparable damage as a consequence to my “campaign of defamation” and demanding not less than $10,000,000 (ten million dollars) in damages in order to offset their financial losses.

For the full story, check out:

The letter claims that the twins are entirely responsibly for the idea, designs and storyboards for a short film that they attempted to crowd-fund through kick-starter in 2013 and that my designs and storyboards are unauthorized reproductions of their work.
These new claims directly contradict their previous statements affirming that I was  a former employee of theirs (which I never was).
a9e9f-abusive_commentsThese new claims also contradict other statements the twins made, where they admitted that we were working together to create the story and designs (I wasn’t working for them, though, I was mentoring them FOR FREE and at their own request).
These new claims also contradict their own previous admission from October 25th 2013 that I was responsible for the original story.
In addition to that, their claims of being solely responsible for the original design and storyboards  could be met by skepticism since in September of 2012 they admitted of never have studied film-making and as of February 2013, they still admitted of only being able to draw stick figures.
I also have evidence to support their claims, the evidence being assignments they turned in during the time I was still mentoring them, in October of 2012.
A drawing assignment the twins turned in October of 2012, while I was still mentoring them.
For the full story, check out: 

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Bot film sneak-peek

Hey guys

Here are two short clips from a short film that I'm currently developing about bots in space.
It is based upon designs and storyboards that I created over a year ago and that two Scottish twins, Adam and Antony Murphy, owners of Imaginears Animation Studio tried to claim as their own in order to crowd-fund a short film for $250k. For the full story behind their scam, click here.

I hope you like it!

Friday, February 7, 2014

Mr. Peabody and Sherman

Mr. Peabody and Sherman is the last movie I got to work on while at Dreamworks Animation Studios, before I started my new job at Blue Sky Animation Studios.
The movie came out really great and I'm very proud to have worked on it!
I took some snapshots of the shots I either lit or comped, I hope you like them!

Thursday, January 23, 2014

*SCAM* Adam and Antony Murphys Imaginears - UPDATE *SCAM*

This post is intended to shed light on Imaginears Animation Studio. 

I intended for this post to be as factual and unbiased as possible and its main intent is to share my story in hopes that no more artists will get scammed by them.

This blog post was originally made on 01/23/14 and since then I created a blog specifically designed for hosting the information contained in this article as well as future developments.


The co-founders of Imaginears Animation StudioAdam and Antony Murphy attempted an elaborate scam which involved taking some of my original art and storyboards, which I shared with them during a FREE mentorship, and attempting to pass it as their own in order to crowd-fund a short film through Kickstarter for $250,000. I never signed any contract, I was never compensated nor I ever demanded to be. I agreed to mentor them for free and they never received my permission to take my work and claim is as theirs.

They contacted several artists working at major animation studios such as Pixar Animation Studios, Dreamworks Animation, Sony Pictures Animation and asked them to collaborate and appear as testimonials on their Kickstarter. 
A lot of the people they scammed were former college classmates, good friends, former-co-workers or professionals who were at the most one or two degrees of separation away from me.
None of these professionals were told that the story and artwork pertaining to the short film belonged to me, and that Adam and Antony Murphy took them without my permission and as a consequence of that, all of these artists unknowingly participated to the scam. 
Below I posted a graph of Adam and Antony Murphy’s scam associates.
When their associates and testimonials found out about the scam and withdrew their support, Adam and Antony Murphy setup a now-defunct blog, with the intention to bypass Kickstarter and use PayPal in order to receive $110,000 in funds for their short film. 
Their 2nd attempt to crowd-fund the short film failed as well within 24 hours of going live. 
Below is an incriminating video that appeared on their now-defunct crowd-funding blog that features the two of them standing in front of prints of my original art and storyboards, as they pitch a short film idea that they refer to as “Steampunk-AL”. 
A copy of their original video can be found here (click to open):

For those not familiar with them, I previously introduced their scam, on my blog, in October of 2013: here.
Long story short, they are two Scottish individuals who I mentored by e-mail at their own request for several months *at no cost* up until they scammed me by selling me what they repeatedly referred to as a "workstation" (a high performance personal computer) and instead sold me a render node (a computer intended to render images as part of a render farm *not suitable for interactive work/content creation*).

They claimed they were going to use my money to buy me a software license and instead bought themselves a software license which they temporarily leased to me and shortly afterwards transferred onto themselves without notifying me.

Afterwards Adam and Antony Murphy attempted an elaborate scam which involved taking some of my original art and storyboards, which I shared with them as part of my mentorship, and attempted to pass it as their own in order to crowd-fund a short film through Kickstarter for $250,000.
They contacted several artists working at major animation studios such as Pixar Animation Studios, Dreamworks Animation, Sony Pictures Animation and asked them to collaborate and appear as testimonials on their Kickstarter.

Above: A comparison between my original designs and Adam and Antony Murphy's.

Above: A comparison between my original design, Russell from Pixar's "UP" and Adam and Antony Murphy's

Above: A comparison between my original designs and Adam and Antony Murphy's.

When their associates and testimonials found out about the scam and withdrew their support, Adam and Antony Murphy setup a now-defunct blog, with the intention to bypass Kickstarter and use PayPal in order to receive $110,000 in funds for a short film idea.

Their 2nd attempt to crowd-fund the short film failed as well within 24 hours of going live.

On 01/22/14 I received a cease-and-desist letter from a solicitor hired by Adam and Antony Murphy. 

The cease-and-desist letter claims that Imaginears Animation Studio reputation suffered significant damage as a consequence to my campaign to expose their scam and demands compensation from me for at least $250,000 which was the amount they intended to raise through the crowd-funding campaign.

I contacted Kickstarter and inquired about the alleged $250,000 Kickstarter campaign and this was their response:
"Thank you for this information. I do see that an account with profile name "ImaginEars Animation Studio" has a started project but it has never been submitted for review and consequently has never been live on the site. This means that it is not publicly viewable at this time."

Above: Imaginears Animation Studios Kickstarter campaign was never submitted for review.

This makes their claim for damages void as their Kickstarter was never submitted for review in the first place and never was live, therefore I cannot be held accountable for its failure.

The following is evidence that Adam and Antony Murphy's Imaginears Animation Studio never enjoyed a good reputation in the first place and that any damage was entirely self-inflicted and due to their repeated misconduct regarding copyright infringement towards but not exclusively me, Disney, Pixar and Digital Tutors. 

Their company name is borrowed from Walt Disney's Imagineering and their logo borrows the font and the cloud in the background from Disney Pixar's Toy Story's franchise.

Above: A comparison between Walt Disney Imagineering logo and Imaginears Animation Studio logo.

Above: A comparison between Disney Pixar Toy Story 3 logo and Imaginears Animation Studio logo.

Imaginears Animation Studio's logo bears a very close resemblance to Andy's room wallpaper cloud, a very recognizable element that appears repeatedly throughout Pixar's Toy Story movies.

Above: A super-imposition of Imaginears Animation Studio logo and Pixar's Toy Story signature cloud.

Above: A comparison between Imaginears Animation Studio logo and Pixar's Toy Story signature cloud.

According to their LinkedIn, Adam and Antony Murphy graduated college three years ago (2011) and are to this day not credited with anything and don't appear to have any working experience relative to the CG industry.

Above: Adam and Antony Murphy's Experience and Education, as it appears on their linked-in profile.

Yet, less than two years ago (03/29/12) Adam claimed to still be a student and contacted me for advice.

"Can you offer me any advice on creating soft lighting effects for character animation in Maya?"

Above: Adam Murphy's very first e-mail, sent under a different last name (Wormy), for reasons I do not know.

"We would really appreciate it if you could offer us some advice on the lighting and rendering of our character animation."

Above: One of their first e-mails, where (under a different last name) they asked me for lighting and rendering advice.

Three months later Antony Murphy sent me an e-mail asking for lighting advice and he attached a render that featured the character from their first commercial project, which was commissioned by a hardware company specialized in workstations.

Above: Antony Murphy's first e-mail to me, where he too asks me for feedback.

The design of their character bore a striking resemblance to Pixar's character from the short film BURN-E, not simply in terms of overall design but also in terms of graphic design and palette.

Above: A comparison between Adam and Antony Murphy's character and Pixar's BURN-E character.

Before their accounts on CG-talk, CG-hub and CG-architects were shut down they showcased no professional work.

Their CG-hub page, features characters from Pixar's Toy Story 3 in the background, which seems at the very least unprofessional as they fail to credit Pixar for their work:

Above: Imaginears Animation Studio CG-hub page, featuring Pixar's work in the background.

Their now-defunct website, featured striking similarities to Pixar's all the way down the font choice:

Above: A comparison between Pixar's website (above) and Imaginears Animation Studio (below)

Their YouTube channel doesn't seem to contain any professional work, only tests:


Above: Adam and Antony Murphy's youtube channel doesn't contain any professional work.

One of their movies strikes a similarity to a Digital-Tutors fluid simulation tutorial yet fails to credit Digital Tutors for the original content.

Above: A comparison between Digital-Tutors image and Adam and Antony Murphy's.
Their most recent video on their youtube channel is from two years ago.
Their only client, as far as I am aware of, was the workstation business that Adam and Antony Murphy were working for when they first contacted me about two years ago asking for lighting advice.

I contacted the business and asked about their experience working with Adam and Antony Murphy and they replied:

"Yes I remember the Murphy project from my time at WS. Total nightmare."

Above: An e-mail from Imaginears Animation Studio first and last client

Another person, who used to work for the same business described his experience in detail.

 "Yes they are deceitful, yes they are crafty, yes they are scammers, and yes they have been ripping other peoples work off as their own to get clients to 'buy' into them."

Above: An e-mail from Imaginears Animation Studio first and last client.

In conclusion it seems that Adam and Antony Murphy's reputation was not hard-earned and that their claims of irreversible damage are only traceable to their repeated misconduct regarding copyright infringement towards but not exclusively me, Pixar and Digital Tutors.

The letter then claims that I have selectively edited and taken out of context my conversations with Adam and Antony Murphy.

Those claims are unfunded as I made a conscious effort to post complete unedited e-mails, including original typos, specifically with the intent to be as factual, unbiased and transparent as possible.

The only changes that I made to those conversations prior to posting them, were to remove personal information and to highlight passages of importance in order to dispute the claims put forth in the cease-and-desist letter.

The opposite can be said of Adam and Antony Murphy, who to this day haven't provided evidence in support of their claims of a binding agreement between us that would give them rights to copy, distribute and claim responsibility for my art.

Next the letter claims that the machine I was sold by Adam and Antony Murphy was meant to be used as a (render) node and that I knew this well before purchasing it.
It also states that the software license that they purchased for me was meant to be leased and only limited to the time that I was contracted to work with them.

This is despite lack of evidence that such contract ever existed.

In order to dispute these claim I have no choice but to post several conversations that took place between me and Adam and Antony Murphy. 

The conversations clearly demonstrate that they offered to sell me what they referred to as a "workstation" several times and advertised an incorrect graphic card (they promised a Quadro but delivered an ATI) which goes against the letter's claims that the machine was advertised as a render node before my purchase. In regards to their spontaneous offer to buy me a Renderman Studio license with a portion of the money that I would send them for the workstation, they fail to inform me that the license would be leased and only at the condition that I would produce training material for them.

Their first mention that the license was essentially only leased to me occurs three months after the money transaction, after I informed them that due to the nature of the machine that they sold me I was unable to produce any training material.

Unsurprisingly at no point in our conversations prior to the purchase, there is a single mention of a binding contract between me and Adam and Antony Murphy and in fact during several of my conversations with them they specifically write:

"we also purchase a renderman license, for you because we knew we couldn't repay the advice you continue to give us. And we thank you for that. :) "

"When we get you a renderman studio license, you'll be able to make tutorials to your hearts content :O)"

Their statements don't indicate any condition to my access of the renderman license and in fact, the expression "to your heart's content" suggests an unconditional access to it.


At this point I thought I had *only* been scammed for money and time.
Almost a whole year later, in an attempt to mentor some friends of mine back in school, I tried to use the Renderman license that was purchased for me by Adam and Antony Murphy.

To my surprise I found out through the sales associate that Adam and Antony Murphy had transferred back the license onto themselves *without notifying me*.

Above:  An e-mail from a Renderman Sales associate informing me that the license was only leased to me.

I created a new message and typed in Adam's name as the recipient for the e-mail and realized his avatar was a painted rendition of one of my designs from 10/10/12.
I immediately contacted him and reminded him that he had no rights to my work.

Above:  Adam and Antony Murphy's avatar, displaying a painted rendition of my design.

On 10/24/13 I found out through a friend about their Kickstarter campaign and was able to contact their associates and convince them that I was in fact the original creator of the art and storyboards and to withdraw their support to Adam and Antony Murphy.

For almost a whole year, Adam and Antony Murphy took my art and storyboards and sent them to individuals and studios claiming it as their own and asking them to take part into a Kickstarter campaign with the intent to raise $250,000 for the production of a short film.

On 10/25/13, after I successfully contacted Adam and Antony Murphy's associates and convinced them to withdraw their support to Imaginears Animation Studio, Adam and Antony contacted me and offered me a deal, which I promptly refused:

They offered credit for the original story and monetary compensation as long as I would stop interfering with their crowd-funding efforts. 

"We will give you credit in the finished film for the work that you contributed and a small percentage of the funds we raise from kick starter. That way, you get the credit for your work and you get paid for it. "

Above: Adam and Antony Murphy's offer.
Above:  My refusal.

Shortly after I refused their offer they setup a now-defunct blog with the intent to defame me which is still available here:

In the blog, they claim once again that I am a former employee of Imaginears and that I had to be let go due to my abusive comments, yet fail to provide evidence of such "for-hire" agreement:

Once again, In order to prove that I was in fact creating my artwork without any sort of formal contract, or obligation, I have no choice but to post a conversation that took place between me and Adam and Antony Murphy after my return to work, from a two-weeks stay-at-home vacation where I devoted myself to produce personal work.

My vacation culminated in a big blog post that contained a large a mount of sketches that Adam and Antony Murphy later took without my permission and knowledge in order to crowd-fund a short film:


Above: One of the sketches that I made during my stay-at-home vacation.

"ImaginEars Animation Studio and it's Directors have been the subject of an unprecedented online attack by one artist of the CG Industry in the USA. An artist who is in fact a former employee of ImaginEars who had to be let go due to his abusive comments."

Adam and Antony continue in their attacks, claiming that I posted confidential information and that I was working for Imaginears in a consultative role yet fail to provide evidence of such "for-hire" agreement.

"The artist has taken to slandering ImaginEars by posting confidential emails omitting vital evidence to suit his own argument, which proves he was working for ImaginEars. And this is in spite of recognising that he was indeed working for ImaginEars in a consultative role. "

Adam and Antony conclude their argument stating that this is a personal attack due to the fact that I was let go, and yet once gain fail to provide evidence for such claims such as a termination notice. 

"The attack is personal he's not happy that we let him go, and he's hell bent on revenge."

Finally, the last claim contained in the letter that I intend to dispute is that I cannot provide evidence that they copied any of my material:

I have in fact clear evidence that Adam and Antony Murphy copied my work and I also purchased copyrights to my work in the US.

On 10/25/13  Adam and Antony Murphy claimed that I was working for them and that they aren't using any of my artwork.

"We haven't violated any copyright. You were working for ImaginEars Animation Studio when we were all creating the story and designs. You don't hold any copyright over the story and we are not using any of your artwork. "

To this day they haven't provided evidence of such "for-hire" agreement and as their previous mentor, who gave them drawing assignments, provided lighting training material and performed paint-overs and drawing and painting demonstrations *FOR FREE* and under no formal or established obligation, I still claim full copyrights to my artwork.

In response to their claim that they aren't using any of my artwork I have clear evidence proving the exact opposite:

I am in possession of a copy of their crowd-funding video, which appeared publicly on their 2nd attempt to crowd-fund a short film that they refer to as"Steampunk-AL".
In their 2nd attempt at crowd-funding the short film, they setup a now-defunct blog, with the intention to bypass Kickstarter and use PayPal in order to receive funds.

The blog was taken offline less than twenty-four hours after its creation and has been offline ever since.

I took snapshots of that website and also printed physical copies as well.

In the video they appear in front of prints of my original art and storyboards, as they pitch the project.

I took a snapshot of the images as they appear in the footage and compared it to my original art and it is a 100% match.
The storyboards strike a very close resemblance to my own and were created by their associates who were provided my original art and were asked to reproduce it. 

Above: The Murphy Brothers as they appear in their crowd-funding video, standing in front of my art.
Above: my original sketch for a space bus driver.
Above: my original sketch for a space vehicle.
Above: my original sketch for a space school-bus.
Above: my original sketch for a space vehicle.
Above: my original sketch for space bots.
Above:  A picture of six original sketchbooks, which I still own, laid down next to each other.

I posted the vast majority of those sketches over a year ago here on this very blog:

I still own all my original sketchbooks that contain the drawings I posted online and several hundreds more undisclosed ones, that I created over the course of almost two years.

Altogether the massive amount of work in my possession, the distinct style of those pictures and the two years long electronic trail of work that I posted online regarding this project clearly demonstrates that I am solely responsible for both the art and story for my short film.

In response to claims that Adam or Antony Murphy could be responsible for my art, Adam Wormy (Murphy) himself admits at one point that he can only draw sticks figures.

"Your drawings are amazing, the way you manage to capture the light. Are there any books or tutorials you can recommend for me to learn how to draw properly? (Basically i can draw stick men and thats it.)"

Above:  Adam Wormy (Murphy) admits he can only draw stick figures.

As much as it pains me to post work from my students online, I find myself forced to provide evidence that Adam and Antony Murphy would have not been able to produce the images they claim responsibility for, due to their lack of draftsmanship and therefore decided to post their rough composition studies for a drawing assignment that I gave them in October of 2012:

The title of the assignment I gave them was "Red Riding Hood".

Above:  Adam and Antony Murphy's drawing assignments from 10/02/2012.

In absence of evidence pointing to a "for-hire" agreement to prove that I ceded copyrights for my art, and given the quality of the work that Adam and Antony Murphy were capable of producing at the time, nobody can claim the art in question as their own, but me.

Above: Time-Stamped pictures I took of my original sketches.

Above: One of very first passes at the storyboards for my short.
Thank you for taking time to read.

Take care!